Ethical Decision Making

The slickness say involves Alex , a bookman of roentgen ray applied light who was having his scratch encounter with patient roles in the fatality room . As a savant , he was there to learn the techniques congenital in dealing with injured patients . His concern , therefore , was to teach as much experience as he smoke learn from , following e rattling instruction presumptuousness him by his instructor , Ms . Dubois . Ms . Dubois , on the early(a) open , aside from macrocosm an instructor , was also the roentgen ray supervisory program of the hospital She was , therefore , performing a dual occasion and her responsibilities included teaching Alex the effective techniques in winning x-rays of emergency room patients while at the comparable time sightedness to it that the task was being done correctly - which means winning the x-rays without hurting or further injuring the patients . meanwhile , the patient in question , Mr . Hanson , was seriously injured , plainly he was mobile . He was in the hospital motivation relief of his embodied aches , not to be subjected to more supernumerary painsIf Alex succeeded in taking the x-rays of the head and neck of Mr Hanson on his first attempt , the plight should not have occurred Therefore , his being a student should not have mattered each . all the same his lack of experience thrustd the patient great pain during the collar times that he manipulated the head and neck of Mr . Hanson to take the x-rays , openhanded rise to a dilemma : should the patient have been cognizant that the one taking his x-rays was that a studentAccording to Beauchamp and Childress who were cited by Limentani , the billet of an respectable commandment is , at best , starring(predicate) facie This means that a pattern is provided rear on al l cause unless it is in conflict with equal! or stronger duties In this case study , therefore the principles of non-maleficence , beneficence , and autonomy have prima facie status . However , Ms .

Dubois clearly believed that the principles of non-maleficence and beneficence had been binding in this case so she chose not to inform the patient that Alex was only a student for fear that Mr . Hanson might break down uncorrectable and prevent them from taking the x-rays , thinking that a absolute student might cause him more pain than prerequisite . Since the x-rays were very important for his treatment , Ms . Dubois could be reassert in believing that Mr . Hanson should not b e given any cause for anxiety and alarm which might turn him into a ill patient and make it impossible for them to take the x-ray (Limentani . 1999 ) some other justification for Ms . Dubois exploit is the precept of Double exertion of Fowler Ariff (1987 ) referred to by Mosby (n .d , that any action that could attention the patient , though painful , could be considered ethical if : the action itself is heartfelt the performer intends only the faithful effect the uncollectible effect is not a means to a good end and a favorable balance exists between the good and bad set up Clearly , Ms . Dubois was only interested in component part Mr Hanson have the...If you want to get a full essay, install it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay