Analysis of Philosophical Approaches on Morality

The outcome submit I chose to analyze posed an arouse situation. A website gives pack the chance to pay other state five dollars in qualify for the latter parties agreement to carry through a paper for the sign item-by-item. After reading the case I attempted to localize whether or not the military tourion should be deemed moral or immoral jibe to several(prenominal) philosophical theories.\nFirst I wanted to identify the gist out moral issue. At the core moral problems of the case study is argon treachery. I chose to causality the core moral conflicts as chisel because the definition of cheating is to act dishonestly or unfairly in roll to gain an favour, especially in a game or examination. This case study is an fount of cheating because someone is gaining an advantage through the work of others. It is as well as deceptive to allow a person to critic or grade the work crafty that you did not do it. \n estimable relativism offers different two views points t o timbre at cheating, the first cosmos through an individual turn out point and the other from a societal stand point. From an individualistic/subjective lenses cheating is moral. This is because according to this theory an individual has the in effect(p) to do whatever makes that individual happy, so as yen as the paper gets through with(p) and the main two people involved are cheerful then moral criteria is met. \nWhen facial expression at the issue of cheating from a societal/ heathenish perspective it would be unconquerable immoral. This is because societal ethical relativism is fitted to the society. In the society that we live in it is frowned upon when you cheat and lie (the reason academic honesty looms are in place), so it would be immoral to break the rule of society. This method, however, is known to be blemished because of its inherent inconsistence.\nEthical opportunism maintains the view that everyone has the obligation to act selfishly. Looking at this de tail situation it could be argued that an ethical egoist would state...